Next UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan, Sat, Oct 31 (Moicano vs. Nolan)Results UFC 333Alexander Volkanovski def. Movsar EvloevPetr Yan def. Merab DvalishviliLone'er Kavanagh def. Ramazan TemirovAlexander Volkov def. Rizvan KunievAaron Pico def. Losene KeitaDominick Reyes def. Azamat Murzakanov
Opinion

Rakhmonov vs. Della Maddalena in Dallas Is the Cure for Coasting Main Events

MMA Sucka reports the two are due to fight Jan. 30, and that booking is the template the UFC should be copying everywhere.

Shavkat Rakhmonov
Photo: Shavkat Rakhmonov: Ruslankyrykbayev, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

MMA Sucka put it in a single headline on Oct. 26: Shavkat Rakhmonov is due to fight Jack Della Maddalena on Jan. 30 in Dallas. That’s the whole report as it reached me. There’s no bout order, no word on whether a belt or a guaranteed shot is attached, and nothing from either camp. Everything past the names, the date and the city is my opinion. Label it that way and read on.

My opinion is that this is the best booking the UFC has made in a long while, and it’s exactly what Contender Series thinking looks like when it reaches the top of a division.

The philosophy, not the paperwork

I’m not going to tell you which building each of these men walked out of on his way to the UFC. That isn’t my point. By Contender Series thinking I mean a matchmaking instinct. Find people who fight to end fights, reward them for it, and then put them in front of each other while they’re still hungry instead of parking them in a line for a title shot that keeps sliding down the calendar. What makes that format fun to watch is the feeling that a polite decision won’t get anybody anywhere. You have to make the room feel something. Scale that instinct up from a Tuesday night audition to the sharp end of a division and you get two contenders in one cage in Texas at the end of January.

The alternative is the thing that’s been quietly wrecking fight nights.

We all know the shape of it. The two best guys available get matched with so much riding on the result that both decide, around the middle of Round 3, that losing is the only real danger in the building. So they hang at the edge of range. One jab, one feint, one half-committed leg kick, reset, repeat. The crowd starts booing in Round 4 and gives up by Round 5. Somebody’s hand goes up on a wide decision and the broadcast tries to sell it as tactical brilliance. I’ve sat through more of those than I want to count, and I’d bet you have too.

Here’s what bugs me most. Coasting is rational. If the reward for winning is a title shot and the punishment for losing is the back of the queue, then a careful 25 minutes is just smart business. The fighters aren’t the villains. The incentives are. Change who gets matched with whom, and how quickly, and you change the fight.

The best case against me

The strongest counterargument goes like this: the elite level is supposed to be cautious, because the people there are good enough to punish every wasted motion, and a regional-style finisher who throws everything gets exposed the moment he meets someone who can defend it. Fair. I’ll concede that a five-round fight between top contenders can look like chess and still be great.

But chess still needs both players to move. The trouble was never caution. It was matchmaking that made sitting still the winning strategy. When you book two contenders against each other directly, with no guarantee that a safe win parks you at the front of anything, the math flips. Neither man can afford a forgettable night, because a forgettable win over a peer doesn’t separate you from that peer in anybody’s eyes. You have to beat him, clearly, and preferably early. That’s the antidote. It’s also the oldest idea in the sport, and the UFC keeps forgetting it.

What the UFC should do next

The report doesn’t say what this fight is for. I hope the promotion fixes that quickly and says out loud that the winner is next. Not “in the conversation.” Next. Pairing two contenders only works as a cure for coasting if the reward for winning is concrete and the reward for waiting is nothing. Leave it vague and you’ve built the right fight on the wrong incentives, and both men would be justified in fighting like they’ve got a backup plan.

I’d also like to see it get the full 25 minutes on paper, whatever slot it lands in. The five-round format isn’t the problem. Five rounds between two people who both believe the only way forward is through the other guy is the best thing this sport produces. It’s the five rounds between two people protecting a spot in line that put crowds to sleep.

There’s a reason a booking like this lights up group chats the minute it leaks. Fans can feel it when a fight has no exit ramp. One man leaves Dallas with a claim on something real. The other leaves with a loss to a peer and no excuse to hide behind.

So here’s my one request for Jan. 30. Touch gloves at the start, then spend the rest of the night trying to take each other’s heads off. Dallas has earned that much.

Sources: MMA Sucka

Keep reading